Summary – Mark Carney highlights a deep structural break in the world order driven by rising great-power rivalry and weakening international norms.,
Article –
Mark Carney, a well-known global economic leader, has drawn attention to a deep structural break occurring in the world order. This change is marked by growing rivalry among great powers and a steady weakening of the established international norms that have supported global stability for decades.
Background
The geopolitical landscape has grown increasingly unstable over recent years. The aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic exposed economic vulnerabilities, while tensions have intensified particularly between the United States and China, and between NATO countries and Russia. This has led to a decline in multilateral cooperation and a rise in unilateral and protectionist policies. Carney’s remarks shed light on the stress facing the post-World War II rules-based international system.
Key events fueling this transition include:
- Trade disputes starting in the late 2010s
- Increased military activity in the Indo-Pacific
- Diplomatic conflicts involving alliances and global governance bodies
These tensions have disrupted financial markets and supply chains, contributing to inflation and altering international trade patterns.
The Global Impact
The intensification of power competition affects all regions and economic sectors. The fragmentation threatens the era of globalization, potentially leading to a resurgence of economic blocs and a rethinking of supply chain dependencies. Politically, the erosion of consensus complicates conflict resolution, climate diplomacy, and trade agreements.
Carney emphasizes that this is not a short-term transition but a fundamental change that may last for years, impacting institutions such as:
- The United Nations (UN)
- The World Trade Organization (WTO)
- Climate accords like the Paris Agreement
For governments and businesses, this means adapting to a world where uncertainty is normal and strategic competition often exceeds cooperation on global challenges like pandemics and climate change.
Reactions from the World Stage
Responses to this new global order vary:
- Some leaders call for rebuilding alliances and strengthening multilateral institutions to counterbalance great-power rivalry.
- Others prioritize national interests, adopting more cautious or confrontational approaches.
Economic forums such as the G20 stress dialogue and coordination to stabilize growth and tackle shared threats like inflation and energy security. Regional blocs including the European Union and ASEAN seek to balance relations with powerful nations while maintaining internal unity.
Experts warn that the weakening of shared rules increases risks of misunderstanding and escalation, especially around hotspots like the Taiwan Strait and Eastern Europe. Sustained dialogue, confidence-building, and updating international norms are seen as essential steps.
What Comes Next?
Several future paths are conceivable:
- Continued fragmentation with economic decoupling and deeper geopolitical divides.
- A recalibrated global order that incorporates rising powers and revitalizes cooperation suited to today’s challenges.
The influence of emerging economies and technological progress, such as digital governance and climate resilience, will be significant in shaping these outcomes.
In conclusion, Carney’s warning stresses the urgent need for global actors to reassess their strategies. Successfully managing great-power relations while maintaining shared global objectives will likely define international relations in the coming decades.
About The Author
