Recent US air strikes targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, raising questions about the actual extent of the damage. While US President Donald Trump claimed these sites were “completely destroyed,” intelligence reports indicate the damage might be less severe than expected. Kremlin and independent sources describe the harm as “moderate to severe,” with Moscow stating it’s too early to fully assess the situation.
Satellite images reveal damage consistent with follow-up strikes, yet Tehran insists the nuclear program continues, warning that “the game is not over.” The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Chief Rafael Grossi emphasized the importance of returning inspectors to Iranian sites as a top priority for accurate damage evaluation.
The controversy has sparked reactions globally, with Iran starting a crackdown following the conflict and Israel’s Prime Minister Netanyahu calling it a “historic victory.” Meanwhile, diplomatic efforts continue at the NATO summit in The Hague, where US President Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy amid heightened geopolitical tensions.
This unfolding story raises concerns about security in the Middle East and the future of Iran’s nuclear ambitions. Experts remain divided on the real impact of the strikes, making vigilance crucial in the coming days.
Stay tuned to Questiqa World News for more latest updates.
About The Author
